From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 10 13:22:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFB737B400; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480C043E31; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 13:22:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [10.2.1.200] (vpn-client.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.200]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6AKLep4080596; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:21:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Subject: Re: Review gstreamer port (was update devel/popt to 1.6.4) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20020710194851.60195.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> References: <20020710052443.61623.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> <1026310891.351.7.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20020710160902.30274.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> <1026325367.351.60.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20020710192309.32462.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> <1026329207.356.1.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20020710194851.60195.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 10 Jul 2002 16:22:29 -0400 Message-Id: <1026332550.356.15.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 15:48, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 03:26:24PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 15:22, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > > > > I simply removed all the test build stuff. That was the only thing that > > failed. After removing the test components from cothreads and > > gstreamer, everything built just fine. > > > Hey, that's not fair. :) I want to get those bits too since > the developers require that tests be run in order to accept support > requests. > However, I am almost caving too. :( I find most GNOME developers will help without even asking about the tests. If they wanted the tests to work, they should have protected things like posix_memalign like they did in the real code. My advice is to test the actual application, and if it seems to work, let the tests go :-). Joe > > Regards, > > -- > Mario S F Ferreira - DF - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." > Computer Science Undergraduate | FreeBSD Committer | CS Developer > flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org > feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message