From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 10 15:30:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1541065672 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D3B8FC13 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAAFUEiQ016085 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oAAFUEnO016082; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:30:14 GMT Message-Id: <201011101530.oAAFUEnO016082@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Rodrigo OSORIO (ros)" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/150974: www/cybercalendar : port fix / deprecate X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Rodrigo OSORIO \(ros\)" List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:30:14 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/150974; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Rodrigo OSORIO (ros)" To: Stefan Walter Cc: Mohacsi Janos , wen heping , GNATS Subject: Re: ports/150974: www/cybercalendar : port fix / deprecate Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:03:13 +0100 Stephan, I approve the removal for two reasons : - The application is useless (the dates are harcoded) : no event can be scheduled after december 2010. - There is no mantainer for the code *the last version was released in 2001* Maintaining this application active is a good way to confuse users about ports reliability. regards, Rodrigo On 10/11/10 14:53 +0100, Stefan Walter wrote: > Hi, > > given that Janos agreed that the port is no longer maintainable, is there > any point in updating it at all? Wouldn't it be better to just deprecate > it and schedule its removal, say, a month or two later? > > Regards, > Stefan