From owner-freebsd-security Thu Aug 10 20:34:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EC537B6ED; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 20:34:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA06388; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 21:34:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id VAA31525; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 21:33:54 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200008110333.VAA31525@harmony.village.org> To: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: suidperl exploit Cc: "Vladimir Mencl, MK, susSED" , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:36:25 PDT." References: Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 21:33:54 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message Kris Kennaway writes: : I believe FreeBSD to be safe from this particular misfeature - FreeBSD's : mail(1) program lives in another location, as already noted, and I don't : even know if it supports the required features to exploit it. We do support getting variables from the environment in our mail. We need to look into all the implications. Of course, most programs on the system use sendmail directly. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message