Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:10:38 -0500 From: "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net> To: "James Housley" <jim@thehousleys.net> Cc: <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>, <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Subject: Re: erlang port -- a poster child (Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 r Message-ID: <00e901c023d5$b8f2cce0$7d7885c0@genroco.com> References: <200009211227.IAA42894@misha.privatelabs.com> <39CA0291.C291F9D1@thehousleys.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "James Housley" <jim@thehousleys.net> > mi@aldan.algebra.com wrote: > > Please, consider new PR-class(es) (port-update, port-maintainer) for > > this -- that's much more formal, easier to search for and more obvious > > for a person filling it the PR out. One person so far agreed and no one > > objected... > > Here is my message of support. Let me see if I have this straight. > > "port-update" is for changes/fixes/etc from everyone but the maintainer. > > "port-maintainer" is for changes/fixes/etc from the maintainer. > > Which is used for a new port? > How about adding another PR class for new ports (port-new). Scot To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00e901c023d5$b8f2cce0$7d7885c0>