Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Feb 2002 22:51:25 -0800
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        Andrew Kenneth Milton <akm@theinternet.com.au>
Cc:        Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD unfinished NIS+ implementation in Linux ?
Message-ID:  <3C70A46D.41F05C21@mindspring.com>
References:  <20020217161648.W17787-100000@levais.imp.ch> <200202172007.g1HK7Tl25937@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20020218124719.K90065@zeus.theinternet.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> There is unfortunately a section of the GPL community who confuses this
> with the right to simply relicense BSDL code whenever you want, because it
> doesn't explicitly deny it. The FSF 'GPL compatible' licenses page makes
> this even more confusing (IMO).
> 
> If you want to stop your BSDL code being used in GPL projects (not sure
> why you would want to), stick the advertising clause in, this then makes
> the BSDL GPL incompatible (according to the FSF).

The FSF is wrong on "compatible".

No matter what license is on the code, relicensing it
under a different license without the author's written
permission is not legal.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C70A46D.41F05C21>