From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue May 3 19:25:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85C1B2CB5C for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8C001122 for ; Tue, 3 May 2016 19:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id t10so39551051ywa.0 for ; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:25:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=OsIKG0VphdVSAmDRTvEC7nsW+Ot9nLo3AJFYce2Pj4c=; b=yfwQFKTdLUlAA3ed4GaYThgSyMD5ppx9vOoEwB7qPruSU+wQQq7zHs1QzeFBSZ0Lr3 zxNcA9Z3slgxlbpwJl3r8xpl3Dv55bz4VL5uBcinPk+a7F8Rqq252gc8OfwzzB8Bd86s S0TvM1qAI3VADa6oWTqE3y6wAmsVHOigMcTkdQ/CV+JcdBm4t2BhXEr6shTvNTwIHXM4 1SnJmrNlnXLNY6JZ9Yys+ttXEFQaVzauabWs6KELCbMRAex1hFvF/mNpqi6uR5Yt5eTZ owlaiHHpaVItmvYjoHaoEe/shVoCiOOFGGkkrniN9G7IkAKEV/rpGW7l+Kjkf0FgdMao e05A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=OsIKG0VphdVSAmDRTvEC7nsW+Ot9nLo3AJFYce2Pj4c=; b=GYPBMhrd2//ZBh0hNAKO0cc5FD0nRLT3xNbmJ102mKEgbQC60kZOrDtqtUP2sWb2uq JQaVRrBl089hyUJPY4qdwiR17hGQk3cU/ej29IykJu2zXuBkEvHAgRMNGw5Q61WUhYUV YPuXeQ8o4eb422YZQ0Ck2SA9EvjG7+ZpOKIbaBg5rWdf6kKK/5I4QpyZvEElTlDoy+MI gNM7LB5i6CW0G5WRqFbmZU00h6+BftbBMUpGASupx7ln5GfQCnh2+fsG5JivOCikysSX 0MJ9saZLuW2hZxH5kqHAkkyONjSHwmK0Vrz8vqdFXLEheIZdRm42fae4Nt3IirRJbawk IVAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWufuneBrsK6I5xJsBlOU/mhPOdCPpwv68DE3L5qrGo+9zKWvqcqftsbc0A8QzaGbf3zpofTOl6+OHx+5uT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.37.108.137 with SMTP id h131mr2250019ybc.83.1462303542833; Tue, 03 May 2016 12:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.224.15 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2016 12:25:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 12:25:42 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MODULES_OVERRIDE deprecated in amd64? From: Michael Sierchio To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 19:25:44 -0000 PS - I am aware of the /etc/make.conf option, WITHOUT_MODULES= TRUE, but my experience was that this gets applied after the MODULES_OVERRIDE list. - M On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > I realize that most of my custom kernel builds have been for embedded > devices and therefore i386. In building a monolithic kernel for AWS EC2 on > amd64, I've noticed the MODULES_OVERRIDE="" directive does nothing. Is > there an equivalent? > > - M >