From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 14:29:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80A91065687; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDF38FC1A; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:29:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:Content-Type; bh=eztKsqMMLfAgXvw40tU0JO0K0HwKuHQA67U3mdJiVIw=; b=EdIG0476P80tqL5mrO6O7gwBEJTwmXe0+1V4VuByN3lrDaJgvlo/+yOOF5Q2D1G+1/yELjztqwTh18mRs9vomIW4uDAski32om4yAPaPWkpR+TDv1cvGrWc4SGdnYJs/; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Scdhu-000M0U-9g; Thu, 07 Jun 2012 09:29:02 -0500 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpa id 1339079341-26372-26371/5/52; Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:29:01 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: miwi@FreeBSD.org, Vitaly Magerya References: <20120607203753.2466c63a.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FD0A7F2.9030504@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 09:29:00 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4FD0A7F2.9030504@gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.64 (FreeBSD) X-SA-Score: -1.5 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, x11@FreeBSD.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] Xorg 7.7 ready for testing! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 14:29:04 -0000 On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 08:09:06 -0500, Vitaly Magerya wrote: > Will it be possible to provide, say pkgng repo with packages compiled > with new xorg and new mesa? That would simplify testing (and using) by a > very large factor. We'd just change PACKAGESITE and run pkg upgrade. The ability to add multiple PACKAGESITEs somehow and the latter ones override the former if they provide conflicting packages would be an interesting way to handle testing things like this...