From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 14 21:43:29 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAD216A46B for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:43:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3195B13C45D for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:43:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAELhHSv007189 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:43:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:43:27 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200711141539.47515.freebsd@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200711141539.47515.freebsd@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711141543.27342.freebsd@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:43:29 -0000 On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: > my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of its > items it updated: > > [root@canopus ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- > cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System > > but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: > > ===> cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: > => cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. > Reference: > c.html> => Please update your ports tree and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build > it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port security > settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. > > thanks, another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it says: Affects: cups-base <1.3.3_1 but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd@dfwlp.com