Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 20:04:24 PDT From: "- john -" <eddie_rebel@hotmail.com> To: solca@fisicc-ufm.edu Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux under load Message-ID: <19990508030424.55395.qmail@hotmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[please keep it in english. native languages are hard to understand.] was this a flamebait? babelfish and i had fun with it anyhow. ---- solca@fisicc-ufm.edu wrote: >sera que pueden meterle una super business app como >SAP R/3? anyone who put their SAP R/3 environment on a linux box ought to have their head examined. trust me. >sera que pueden portearlo a las siguientes arquitec- >turas: Digital ARM, AP1000+ Multicomputer, DEC Alpha, >DEC MIPS R2000/3000/4000, PDA's (ej. PalmPilot), >ELKS (8086, 8088, x186, x286), m68k (Motorola >Apollo DN hardware, IBM MCA (PS/2, RS/6000, AS/400), hmmm, rs/6000 and linux? and AS/400 is more like *fiber* channel than micro channel, but thatīs besides the point. you also forgot the z80 processor, betcha linux will run smooth on that one.... and what is an (x)80186? (maybe thats also besides the point?) >Sera entonces que si hace todo esto no puede con >grandes cargas? Sera que es un OS de desktop? >Si ustedes saben de algun otro sistema >operativo que haga todo esto y ademas este creciendo >mas que linux en popularidad ok, so your point is: It doesnīt matter if it can handle lots of load, or is a "desktop OS" because linux can do all theese other tings? Who cares about reliability anyway? -- john, 5 am going to bed. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990508030424.55395.qmail>