From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Oct 19 2:10: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C374E37B405 for ; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 02:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f9J9A1w18937; Fri, 19 Oct 2001 02:10:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 02:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200110190910.f9J9A1w18937@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Dave Chapeskie Subject: Re: ports/31368: Update port: devel/doxygen 1.2.11 -> 1.2.11.1 Reply-To: Dave Chapeskie Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/31368; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Dave Chapeskie To: Matthias Andree Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, dwcjr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/31368: Update port: devel/doxygen 1.2.11 -> 1.2.11.1 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 05:00:34 -0400 On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 10:43:29AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > I cannot see how and why a "maintainer" update sticks with an old version, > although a CURRENT PR exists: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=31104 Then you don't know how the PR system works wrt non-committers. ports/30943 was submitted the day after 1.2.11 was released. I never saw PR 31104 (it was never CCed to me and it was also mis-filed). I did however submitted the exact same patch as a followup to ports/30943 on Oct 7, the day 1.2.11.1 was released. gnats seemed to have lost it however. -- Dave Chapeskie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message