From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Oct 31 23:07:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDAAE3E64E for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 23:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9131867D9E for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 23:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359DE1832C; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 08:07:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58842E92B; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 08:07:04 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A9AA2E92A; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 08:07:04 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 08:06:35 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20171101.080635.1904928420192655172.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Three '450.status-security' scripts enabled by default From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <20171101.074325.435079995878776971.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20171031230333.K40402@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20171101.074325.435079995878776971.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.3 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 23:07:06 -0000 From: Yasuhiro KIMURA Subject: Re: Three '450.status-security' scripts enabled by default Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 07:43:25 +0900 (JST) > Thank you for explanation. But in fact today I received 'monthry > security run output' mail from my home server. And I also checked > trash folder of my mailbox and confirmed that I recieved 'weekly > security run output' mail on last Saturday. So there must be something > that doesn't fit your explanation. OMG, again the source of this problem is "pkg". 410.pkg-audit and 460.pkg-checksum doesn't support security_status_*_period variable. Therefore they are always executed if weekly_status_security_enable and/or monthly_status_security_enable is 'YES' (and they are 'YES' by default). --- Yasuhiro KIMURA