From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 20 23:51:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2028A10657F0 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F21E8FC13 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28317 invoked by uid 399); 20 Aug 2010 23:51:50 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 20 Aug 2010 23:51:50 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4C6F1515.7090708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:51:49 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100807 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Baptiste Daroussin References: <201008171940.o7HJebDf077588@repoman.freebsd.org> <4C6D8DBF.8070308@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Thomas Abthorpe , cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/fcgiwrap Makefile ports/www/fcgiwrap/files fcgiwrap.in X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 23:51:52 -0000 On 08/20/2010 01:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > 2010/8/19 Doug Barton: >> This is a very nice looking script, well done! The only problem is that >> _flags should not be added to command_args, it will cause them to be added >> twice since rc.subr already takes care of this. >> >> >> Doug > > thanks. > > Concerning the _flags I'll make the change. Excellent. :) > by the way, the method I use to cleanup trailing unix sockets do you > think that it is clean? or I should find a better way? Not off hand, no. You might want to contact the upstream authors about this issue, it's not very friendly of them to leave sockets laying around ... Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso