From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 06:22:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E0616A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:22:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D446143D30 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 06:22:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from craig@xfoil.gank.org) Received: from localhost (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) by ion.gank.org (mail) with ESMTP id 2EFB92B2FD; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:22:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from ion.gank.org ([69.55.238.164]) by localhost (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06515-02-2; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:22:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from owen1492.uf.corelab.com (pix.corelab.com [12.45.169.2]) by ion.gank.org (mail) with ESMTP id C63062B2FC; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:22:21 -0600 (CST) From: Craig Boston To: Daniel Eischen Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:22:19 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312100822.19428.craig@xfoil.gank.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gank.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nss and pthreads and wine, oh my! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:22:26 -0000 On Tuesday 09 December 2003 11:39 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I am a bit confused though, because I would think nsdispatch works > for other cases and don't know why it isn't for wine. Not a clue there... nsdispatch seems to work fine in every other single-threaded process without a hitch. The only thing I can think of that wine does differently is use its own LDTs, but that's a stab in the dark. > What thread library are you using? I'm using plain old libc_r. I'll try libthr and kse and see if there is any difference. Craig