From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 31 09:14:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FAD16A407 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1A343D6E for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:13:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Gepgw-0004Dk-OJ for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:13:54 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:13:54 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:13:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:13:44 +0100 Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <45470D95.5020801@qbrick.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060625) In-Reply-To: <45470D95.5020801@qbrick.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: SAS Raid - mfi driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:14:01 -0000 Fredrik Widlund wrote: > setups but hit the same limitation again and again. The strange part is > that a Dell raid adapter based on the same chipset, the Perc 5/I, works > well with writes achieving 200MB/s. > > Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Several: - are there cache differences between the controllers (amount of memory, cache policy)? - how does writing directly to the device (bypassing file system) compare?