Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 13:28:11 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r221807 - in head: lib lib/libprocstat lib/libprocstat/zfs lib/libutil sys/kern sys/sys usr.bin/fstat usr.bin/fstat/zfs usr.bin/procstat Message-ID: <20110514102811.GD48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20110514021523.a9be8d81.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <201105121011.p4CABdkM030432@svn.freebsd.org> <20110512112640.GQ48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110514021523.a9be8d81.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--QJLNdq7A0R34yxmQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 02:15:23AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2011 14:26:40 +0300 > Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> mentioned: >=20 > > > > > > The newly introduced fuser(1) utility also uses this library and > > > able to operate via sysctl and kvm backends. > > > > > > The library is by no means complete (e.g. KVM backend is missing > > > vnode name resolution routines, and there're no manpages for the > > > library itself) so I plan to improve it further. I'm commiting it > > > so it will get wider exposure and review. > > > > > > We won't be able to MFC this work as it relies on changes in HEAD, > > > which was introduced some time ago, that break kernel ABI. OTOH > > > we may be able to merge the library with KVM backend if we really > > > need it there. > >=20 > > Could you, please, point out the mentioned ABI changes ? >=20 > Hi, Kostik! >=20 > It seems I was wrong and that change was actually introduced in 8.0. > It thus makes MFC possible. I don't have immediate plans for this > though, but I might do it if there's enough demand and it demonstrates > to be stable enough in HEAD. I did not worried not about inability to merge the libprocstat. It made me very uncomfortable to see the claim of the ABI skew in the area which I supposed to have stable ABI. Thanks for the clarification. >=20 > Sorry for being misleading! --QJLNdq7A0R34yxmQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk3OWTsACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4iwZgCfbx7sIFjAJG9w/6iK9KjYEUOZ yD8AoOOJw9HY6++5J5yiZ2vzKj5YmcDG =nrhe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QJLNdq7A0R34yxmQ--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110514102811.GD48734>