From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 28 15:46:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08B3106564A; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF48F8FC08; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (wilberforce.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by wilberforce.math.missouri.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q6SFkUfv058194; Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:46:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Message-ID: <50140956.1030603@missouri.edu> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 10:46:30 -0500 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120714 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans References: <201207270247.q6R2lkeR021134@wilberforce.math.missouri.edu> <20120727233939.A7820@besplex.bde.org> <5012A96E.9090400@missouri.edu> <20120728142915.K909@besplex.bde.org> <50137C24.1060004@missouri.edu> <20120728171345.T1911@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20120728171345.T1911@besplex.bde.org> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060304040300070501030603" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: Re: bin/170206: complex arcsinh, log, etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:46:32 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060304040300070501030603 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK. This clog really seems to work. x*x + y*y - 1 is computed with a ULP less than 0.8. The rest of the errors seem to be due to the implementation of log1p. The ULP of the final answer seems to be never bigger than a little over 2. --------------060304040300070501030603--