Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 May 2008 10:33:21 -0700
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To:        Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Cc:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Simplifying devfs: minor == unit
Message-ID:  <483C45E1.2040707@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080527172700.GM64397@hoeg.nl>
References:  <20080527130615.GJ64397@hoeg.nl>	<20080527150244.GN21317@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>	<483C4358.2050707@elischer.org> <20080527172700.GM64397@hoeg.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote:
>> Make sure that old binaries that expect the minor number sot be on a  
>> certain format are not broken..
>>
>> try run some old 2.2.5 binaries in a 2.2.5 jail with /dev mounted and  
>> make sure that things like ptys work.
> 
> This should not be a problem. Even though they are called minor numbers,
> they must not be confused with the device minor numbers which are shown
> in /dev. These are always the same as the inode number of the device.
> 
> The minor numbers which are currently being used inside the kernel have
> no actual purpose, but are only there to remain compatible with certain
> KPI's.
> 


as long as that is proved to be true..





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?483C45E1.2040707>