Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:59:39 -0600 (MDT) From: "Ryan Sommers" <ryans@gamersimpact.com> To: "Brian Fundakowski Feldman" <green@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: trap 12 with preempt (and ule) Message-ID: <53475.208.4.77.15.1098212379.squirrel@208.4.77.15> In-Reply-To: <20041019172426.GF1072@green.homeunix.org> References: <16756.47081.304613.940742@ran.psg.com> <20041019134037.GC1072@green.homeunix.org> <16757.16950.231007.263153@ran.psg.com> <20041019165417.GE1072@green.homeunix.org> <16757.18685.756183.845077@ran.psg.com> <20041019172426.GF1072@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> so, the word from the wise is SCHED_4BSD not ULE. and is PREEMPT >> solid with 4bsd? > > It seems pretty solid here on 2xCPU. It is supposed to be mostly solid > now, yes. Turning it off would probably result in little visible > difference unless it's a desktop, or has very high load, or similar. > I wouldn't say ULE is completely instable. I run ULE on all of my equiptment. Best is a production mail server that's been up 50 days, it's a dual 350mhz. I haven't had any scheduler panics in a very long time. -- Ryan Sommers ryans@gamersimpact.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53475.208.4.77.15.1098212379.squirrel>