From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Mar 29 23:13:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA12373 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 23:13:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from caliban.dihelix.com (caliban.mrtc.org [199.4.33.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA12348; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 23:13:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (from langfod@localhost) by caliban.dihelix.com (8.8.5/8.8.3) id VAA01023; Sat, 29 Mar 1997 21:13:47 -1000 (HST) Message-Id: <199703300713.VAA01023@caliban.dihelix.com> Subject: Re: "interfaces" patch to BIND (was Re: problem with over 133 virutal domains with apache on 2.1.7) In-Reply-To: from Brian Tao at "Mar 30, 97 01:37:33 am" To: taob@risc.org (Brian Tao) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 1997 21:13:47 -1000 (HST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, randy@zyzzyva.com From: "David Langford" X-blank-line: This space intentionaly left blank. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Any reasons that we cant add something like this to the default named? I assume that if you dont have an "interface" line that it acts nomrally. Thanks, -David Langford langfod@dihelix.com > A few people asked me about the "interfaces" patch for BIND 4.9.5. >It allows you to specify which particular IP's you want named to >listen on, instead of all available interfaces. This is useful if you >are running BIND on a server handling a lot of virtual Web sites. > > The location of the patch is at: > >http://www.ultra.net/~jzp/andrews.patch.txt > >-- >Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org) >"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" > >