Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:45:00 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck-lists@netcologne.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Size mismatch -- squid-2.5.STABLE9-2GB.patch Message-ID: <42641C4C.2090705@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20050418054901.2197.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> References: <20050418054901.2197.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > * Adam McLaurin <freebsd@irotas.net> [gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports]: [ ... ] >> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/squid-2.5.STABLE9-2GB.patch: >> size mismatch: expected 250589, actual 250618 > > Confirmed, they updated the patch /again/. > > I submitted a maintainer update. Would it save time, bandwidth, and maintainer-cycles to roll all of the patches you want to apply to the FreeBSD port into a gzip/bzip'ed tarball, and have the port grab that rather than chase a dozen live patches this way? -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42641C4C.2090705>