From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 20:45:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C3816A4DC for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:45:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6BD43D66 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:45:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B645DB3; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:45:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57688-04; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:45:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-53-96.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.53.96]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B00B5DA0; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:45:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <42641C4C.2090705@mac.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:45:00 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050319 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas-Martin Seck References: <20050418054901.2197.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> In-Reply-To: <20050418054901.2197.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Size mismatch -- squid-2.5.STABLE9-2GB.patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:45:28 -0000 Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > * Adam McLaurin [gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports]: [ ... ] >> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.5/bugs/squid-2.5.STABLE9-2GB.patch: >> size mismatch: expected 250589, actual 250618 > > Confirmed, they updated the patch /again/. > > I submitted a maintainer update. Would it save time, bandwidth, and maintainer-cycles to roll all of the patches you want to apply to the FreeBSD port into a gzip/bzip'ed tarball, and have the port grab that rather than chase a dozen live patches this way? -- -Chuck