From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 9 14:22:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E632A746 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1rly2283.eechost.net (uk1rly2283-a.eechost.net [217.69.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD73829D4 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [31.186.37.179] (helo=smtp.marelmo.com) by uk1rly2283.eechost.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VJ2LV-0003bs-Df; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 15:21:41 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.marelmo.com) by smtp.marelmo.com with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VJ2MR-000Ni4-Gc; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:22:39 +0000 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 15:22:39 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: aurfalien Subject: Re: Proper way to share ZFS via NFS Message-Id: <20130909152239.05eff4e8daf98d0659636dec@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auth-Info: 15567@permanet.ie (plain) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:22:43 -0000 On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:43:03 -0700 aurfalien wrote: > Hi, > > Wondering whats the correct way to share ZFS, /etc/exports or via zfs > commands which alter /etc/zfs/exports? As far as I can see both work just fine. The first has the benefit that it puts your ZFS exports in the standard place for exports and won't need fiddling with if you decide that you want to move one of them to some other filesystem. The second has the benefit that it integrates better with the ZFS tools. The one thing you don't want to do is put the same export in both. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith