From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 25 13:07:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E26F16A405 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:07:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lordcow@lordcow.org) Received: from srvbsdsmt002.uct.ac.za (srvbsdsmt002.uct.ac.za [137.158.153.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CDA13C45B for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lordcow@lordcow.org) Received: from mail.uct.ac.za ([137.158.153.100]) by srvbsdsmt002.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JTcUv-000L22-GI for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:31:57 +0200 Received: from lhc.phy.uct.ac.za ([137.158.92.134]) by mail.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1JTcUt-000Ec3-GB for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:31:55 +0200 Received: from lordcow by lhc.phy.uct.ac.za with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JTcUv-0001qE-6O for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:31:57 +0200 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:31:57 +0200 From: gareth To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080225123157.GC6807@lordcow.org> References: <20080222172210.GA31869@lordcow.org> <20080222211742.ed8a1c17.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080222211742.ed8a1c17.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Cc: Subject: Re: caching problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:07:31 -0000 On Fri 2008-02-22 (21:17), Emanuel Haupt wrote: > You could host the INDEX file on a mirror running a webserver on a non > standard port. Then you could add something like this > to /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf: > > ENV['MASTER_SITE_INDEX'] = "http://your.index.mirror.tld:81/" thanx > Although adjusting the cache policy seems more reasonable to me. agreed, if only the admins were reasonable ..