From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Mon Sep 14 08:36:47 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148F09CD8CE
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:36:47 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com)
Received: from fep12.mx.upcmail.net (fep12.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.32])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5981A1BF1
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:36:45 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com)
Received: from edge02.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep18-int.chello.at
 (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP
 id <20150914083549.MOBH16929.viefep18-int.chello.at@edge02.upcmail.net>;
 Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:35:49 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.160] ([86.101.30.40]) by edge02.upcmail.net with edge
 id Gwbn1r0020rw6r201wbnr9; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:35:49 +0200
X-SourceIP: 86.101.30.40
Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: Cannot test spamassassin, what is going
 on here?
To: Olivier Nicole <Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th>
References: <wu7io7do6nk.fsf@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nagy_L=c3=a1szl=c3=b3_Zsolt?= <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
Message-ID: <55F686E3.8060205@shopzeus.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:35:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <wu7io7do6nk.fsf@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 08:36:47 -0000


>> But this is wrong, because the email is still identified as ham. But the live server has identified it as spam => still cannot test spamassassin.
> The only test you show is a network test (DNSWL), you have no action on
> the value returned by http://www.dnswl.org/, so it sould have returned
> one result when the live test was run and a different value when you run
> the manual test.
>
> At tmie of the manual test, it seems that the address tested is in the
> white list, hence the message is classified as ham.
>
> As a rule of thumb, the value of network test should be regarded very
> lightly when you run a single message multiple times, because they are
> very likely to change.
Yes, but the test message came from freebsd-questions. Right now I'm 
getting all of the mailing list emails with {Spam?} headers, and I get a 
HAM classification on any of them. Spam requires a score of 5.0 at 
least, and most of the messages I have tested manually scored -5.0. 
Network test might change, but this is definitely not the root of the 
problem.