From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 5 22:54:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C47710656BA; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swell.k@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE498FC13; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 22:54:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so4743764wyb.13 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:54:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=f3xYmeoS/tjWPocgYSOM1QH4lh3OxSnZPuc9jOD6UtE=; b=YmysEihYkxxZsKU7mgbDa9ucuRtRX5Gqpd9gnaSObfGNylHTu9oK4i3+AoYek3o1HN sijZQ7ZZO2CmNJZGpACcr9hNSF7fZYiASwv1DZrp7vifUlXzFOE7JaBpmR6sDEymtD26 pdOiH0YSqkWZlVSGdjWUkUnJwbFThmIm142x8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=ZCPm5NW3HVY4pNvhrvcjMLQC84cr8YzC9tR4eFTQVis44P+ypYITorBKzp5Kl6xUcT r3B566BVqcfHMfUTFE1ql/TEdWY/LEiiJ5qXQFiJyrB7V8CpyzGZ9Yq8YHyhSMUidYOQ szX/wCU01vg9r797Y+Ovh7CZXMuEbcgbm5inA= Received: by 10.227.148.5 with SMTP id n5mr947928wbv.191.1283727245388; Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tor-exit-readme.boughton.eu [195.43.157.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b23sm3990352wbb.16.2010.09.05.15.54.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 05 Sep 2010 15:54:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Anonymous To: ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) References: <201007281223.o6SCN2wZ043075@repoman.freebsd.org> <86sk33w8ck.fsf@gmail.com> <8739v24yop.fsf@monte-cristo.france> <86sk1omm0h.fsf@gmail.com> <861v97zzvt.fsf@chateau.d.if> Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:47:56 +0400 In-Reply-To: <861v97zzvt.fsf@chateau.d.if> (Ashish SHUKLA's message of "Mon, 06 Sep 2010 02:11:58 +0530") Message-ID: <86zkvv4xk3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors/emacs-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/editors/emacs-devel/files patch-Makefile.in patch-configure patch-src-image.c X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 22:54:07 -0000 ashish@FreeBSD.org (Ashish SHUKLA) writes: > Anonymous writes: >> FYI, pointyhat doesn't have that etc/DOC-24.0.50.2 file on 9-CURRENT. >> And there are no packages for 9-CURRENT, neither for amd64 nor for i386. > > I'm surprised. I tried an update of emacs-devel with tinderbox and it resulted > in same file being generated[1]. I guess I'll have to observe the build > process more carefully before pushing the new update. Can't you just make a note to ignore the bug if pointyhat doesn't complain? I think binary packages are more important than corner cases. Besides, have you found anyone else who have same issue on 9-CURRENT?