From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Dec 10 09:44:28 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA17172 for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 09:44:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from timbuk.cray.com (root@timbuk.cray.com [128.162.19.7]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA17164 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 09:44:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from crmunich0 (gwk@crmunich0.cray.com [134.13.65.1]) by timbuk.cray.com (8.8.4/CRI-gate-8-2.11) with SMTP id LAA08686 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 1996 11:44:09 -0600 (CST) Received: by crmunich0 id AA03715; 4.1/CRI-5.6a; Tue, 10 Dec 96 18:44:08 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 96 18:44:08 +0100 From: gwk@crmunich0.cray.com (Georg-Wilhelm Koltermann) Message-Id: <9612101744.AA03715@crmunich0> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Subject: Re: 960501-SNAP: data corruption reading /dev/rwt0 (Wangtek) Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Sender: owner-bugs@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi J"org, do you remember my data corruption problem with the Wangtek? When I checked 2.2-ALPHA I found out that the fix is still not in. Would you care to apply the fix from kern/1065 now, before 2.2 gets out officially? Thanks, Georg-W. Koltermann (gwk@cray.com) > From j@uriah.heep.sax.de Tue Jun 4 21:20:46 1996 > Return-Path: > From: J Wunsch > Subject: Re: 960501-SNAP: data corruption reading /dev/rwt0 (Wangtek) > To: gwk (Georg-Wilhelm Koltermann) > Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 21:14:54 +0200 (MET DST) > Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) > In-Reply-To: <9606031120.AA09745@crmunich0> from Georg-Wilhelm Koltermann at "Jun 3, 96 01:20:12 pm" > X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 > X-Pgp-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E > X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL17 (25)] > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > As Georg-Wilhelm Koltermann wrote: > > > > You've tried it on a 2.1 (or -stable), or on a 2.2-something? (The > > > question is whether i also need to bring it back into the -stable > > > branch.) > > > the data corruption problem was found with 960501-SNAP and verified with > > 2.1-RELEASE. The fix was applied to 960501-SNAP only. I don't run > > 2.1-RELEASE anymore on the machine which has the tape drive. > > Ok. As soon as i've got my Wangtek back again (and thus tested it > once for myself), i will apply the suggested fix. Thank you for your > feedback. > > -- > cheers, J"org > > joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE > Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) >