From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Feb 23 15:13:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE09CAB12FD; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3A3C6F; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EF9F31B22067; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:13:54 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: default ruby version To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Steve Wills , ruby@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <56C40970.4030003@FreeBSD.org> <56CC70EF.3090304@quip.cz> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <56CC7732.7040409@toco-domains.de> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:13:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56CC70EF.3090304@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:13:57 -0000 Hello Miroslav, On 23.02.2016 15:47, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Steve Wills wrote on 02/17/2016 06:47: >> Hi, >> >> Just FYI, baring any objections or major issues coming up, I plan to >> make Ruby 2.2 the default Ruby in the ports tree on March 1. >> >> Puppet users in particular probably want to migrate to sysutils/puppet4 >> or work on testing some sort of patch that makes puppet 3.x work with >> ruby 2.2 before then. >> >> Steve > > Will it be another breakage of www/redmine? > (it is known to have problems with many dependencies after updates) I'm currently working on an update for redmine to version 3.2. This will make it much more stable for updates. Did you have any interest in testing the update? Greetings, Torsten