From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 28 07:32:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869E116A4DA for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4779543D72 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:32:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k6S7WmLr026251; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.11/8.12.3/Submit) id k6S7WmBV026250; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:32:48 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: fooler Message-ID: <20060728003248.A26219@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20060726071232.A96367@xorpc.icir.org> <06a801c6b1fc$bcc83470$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <06a801c6b1fc$bcc83470$42764eca@ilo.skyinet.net>; from fooler@skyinet.net on Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:17:22PM +0800 Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multiple DSL modems and pppoe sessions on the same ethernet ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 07:32:49 -0000 On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:17:22PM +0800, fooler wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Luigi Rizzo" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:12 PM > Subject: multiple DSL modems and pppoe sessions on the same ethernet ? ... > hello luigi, > > have you considered pado's ac-name tag return? according to rfc2516 > section 5.2... the pado packet MUST contain one ac-name tag containing the > access concentrator's name... yes but i am afraid that all lines may carry the same ac-name so that won't help to tell one from another... cheers luigi