From owner-freebsd-mono@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 12 23:17:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mono@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113541065674 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rhyous@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6F78FC17 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:17:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so3708342wyf.13 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:17:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Yy5TSB/LEt3Fg00p0D2i8o3ovpSEu/WlGooCGYqD9mk=; b=FJw6GECpvfQRWxUuMBIVbp0EfUZox1qd4rIZhL8dlnWVn0aZHhRTKTnriEzFtWKYkD ARHmUXPbtss935yKwbu1JShH5R6I43pF2TTeoXfIEjpibe1z/dinr0YggZ2noMTemDhk XmK3a8Nra/CcT1YVmINnqrdH1Sb5hfast/0dk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.101.97 with SMTP id ff1mr19694197wib.42.1321139859227; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:17:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.86.105 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 15:17:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EBEC615.4080609@gmail.com> References: <4EB58FD3.8090209@gmail.com> <4EBEC615.4080609@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 16:17:39 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jared Barneck To: James Colannino , mono@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Building boo-0.9.4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-mono@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Mono and C# applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:17:41 -0000 James, Sounds good. I don't remember why portshaker exists over using the standard ports and keeping the standard ports updated. Maybe the reason is documented somewhere and I haven't read it yet or maybe Romain or one the previous members knows. Thanks, Jared On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:16 PM, James Colannino wrote: > Hey Jared, > > I actually wasn't aware of that site. I was using regular ports when I > attempted to install that package, and when it failed, I ended up building > it outside of ports. I can get the port from portshaker, make it work and > then send it back to the list. > > James > > > On 11/10/11 12:30, Jared Barneck wrote: > >> James, >> >> I am not the project owner and it looks like the project is down to just >> Romain. >> >> I have dabbled here. I assume you have been reading this site: >> http://code.google.com/p/bsd-**sharp/ >> >> Did you use the port from portshaker? or regular ports? >> http://code.google.com/p/bsd-**sharp/wiki/Installing >> >> If you did use portshaker, what I would do is make a copy of the the >> port on your local box. >> >> # cp -fR boo-0.9.4.9 boo-0.9.4.9-devel >> >> Then change the new port as need until it works. >> >> Then zip it and email this list and possibly Romain, too with the >> working zip. And worse case, if we can't get anyone to update this, we >> can go to ports@freebsd.org as that is where >> >> unmaintained ports go. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jared Barneck >> >> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 1:34 PM, James Colannino > >> wrote: >> >> Hi there! I tried to build boo-0.9.4.9 from ports and noticed that >> it was marked as a broken build. I was able to compile and install >> it just fine outside of ports. There was one issue of a few dlls >> not being installed by the Makefile properly, so I had to copy them >> manually after "make install" (that would probably just require a >> patch to the Makefile), but other than that the build was fine. >> >> I wouldn't mind working on the port and making it build cleanly from >> ports, then sending it back to you. I'd love to eventually get >> Banshee 2.2 building from ports (so far, I've got it installed >> outside of ports, along with a few dependencies, and having it >> outside of ports is making me a little uneasy.) That is, if you'd >> be willing to provide a small amount of guidance as needed. I've >> learned a lot, but I'm still somewhat new to FBSD :) >> >> Thanks for reading and for your work maintaining this package! >> >> James >> ______________________________**___________________ >> freebsd-mono@freebsd.org > >> mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/__**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mono >> >> >> > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-mono-unsubscribe@__fr**eebsd.org >> >> >" >> >> >> >