From owner-freebsd-net Wed Dec 5 10:47:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D97437B419; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id fB5IjQ596217; Wed, 5 Dec 2001 20:45:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 20:45:26 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "Louis A. Mamakos" Cc: Eugene Grosbein , "Crist J . Clark" , net@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOARP - gateway must answer and have frozen ARP table Message-ID: <20011205204526.B89520@sunbay.com> References: <20011205124430.A83642@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20011205040316.H40864@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011205231735.A1361@grosbein.pp.ru> <20011205193859.B79705@sunbay.com> <200112051835.fB5IZqH95521@whizzo.transsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200112051835.fB5IZqH95521@whizzo.transsys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 01:35:52PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > Doesn't this behavior need to be on a per-interface basis? I'm wondering > if a single sysctl is sufficient to get the desired effect. > No, we want ARP table to stay intact no matter which interface sends us an update. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message