Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:28:59 -0600 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> To: "Jason W. Bacon" <jwb@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r557295 - in head/sysutils/slurm-wlm: . files Message-ID: <CACNAnaHhC5bKgQUpOT0vgbd%2BXbd%2BXSx528Yyuh9mvDfy4Gmuow@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <202012081621.0B8GLGu7011665@repo.freebsd.org> References: <202012081621.0B8GLGu7011665@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:21 AM Jason W. Bacon <jwb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Author: jwb > Date: Tue Dec 8 16:21:16 2020 > New Revision: 557295 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/557295 > > Log: > sysutils/slurm-wlm: Back out -fno-common patches, add -fcommon flag > > Fixes runtime regression caused by r546150 > > Reported by: jrm > MFH: 2020Q4 > I guess the regression was from the patch to src/plugins/select/cons_tres/job_test.c and an issue somewhere without slurmctld? That patch almost certainly should have made them weak references instead of removing them entirely, based on the comment in the vicinity. Thanks, Kyle Evans
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaHhC5bKgQUpOT0vgbd%2BXbd%2BXSx528Yyuh9mvDfy4Gmuow>