From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 7 20:04:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA23384 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 20:04:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gjp.erols.com (alex-va-n008c243.moon.jic.com [206.156.18.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA23379; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 20:04:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) Received: from gjp.erols.com (localhost.erols.com [127.0.0.1]) by gjp.erols.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA02654; Sat, 7 Mar 1998 23:04:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gjp@gjp.erols.com) To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: Okay, -current should be conditionally safe to use In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Mar 1998 19:58:59 EST." <199803080059.TAA00326@dyson.iquest.net> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 1998 23:04:49 -0500 Message-ID: <2649.889329889@gjp.erols.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "John S. Dyson" wrote in message ID <199803080059.TAA00326@dyson.iquest.net>: > It isn't ready for production yet. SoftUpdates is better -async, but still > not as data-secure as normal mounts. I suggest waiting until late March or > early April. The code is probably late Alpha or near-Beta quality, with > some known problems. Apart from the problems with using Async & SoftUpdates together, what other `known' problems are there? Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message