Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 03:37:28 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: sobomax@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/ghostscript-afpl Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/print/ghostscript-afpl/files escputil.contrib.mak hpijs.contrib.mak patch-hpijs:makefile patch-hpijs:platform.h patch-src:unix-gcc.mak stp.contrib.mak ports/print/ghostscript-afpl/scripts ... Message-ID: <200112280837.fBS8bVf26137@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <1009489628.238.4.camel@notebook>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 Dec, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > On Thu, 2001-12-27 at 21:59, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> On 27 Dec, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: >> >> > - Better support for jpeg WRKDIR location >> >> According to the Ghostscript's Make.htm, the only reason GS needs its >> own version of JPEG, is because Adobe's PostScript interpreters >> "don't follow JPEG standard exactly". Which forces GS developers to >> build JPEG with the following: >> >> #define D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU 64 >> >> perhaps, this is how we should build our JPEG port to start with and >> make gs use -ljpeg, like everything else? > > What's the gain? Generally, it is considered advantageous to share the common libraries between different executables. Smaller run-time memory requirements, smaller on-disk binary size, easier maintainance, etc. -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112280837.fBS8bVf26137>