From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 28 18:45:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C81316A4DA for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:45:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smtp-out3.tiscali.nl (smtp-out3.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9996A43D46 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:45:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from [82.171.39.195] (helo=guido.klop.ws) by smtp-out3.tiscali.nl with smtp (Tiscali http://www.tiscali.nl) id 1GHm6d-0005sd-Q5 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:45:07 +0200 Received: (qmail 1467 invoked from network); 28 Aug 2006 18:45:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO guido.klop.ws) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Aug 2006 18:45:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:45:01 +0200 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org From: "Ronald Klop" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <970c0a6b0607280839qc05e2b8p51118955745b7cda@mail.gmail.com> <20060828161538.GI89053@vision.anyware> <44F332FF.5050809@appriss.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <44F332FF.5050809@appriss.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.01 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto) X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:45:09 -0000 On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:16:31 +0200, David Sledge wrote: > > > > Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> > It is already more than one month now since we talked about the >> > port of Eclipse 3.2. Have you been able to have a successful >> > build on a reasonable number of platforms? >> >> > When do you think you will submit a PR to get this update >> > committed? >> >> > Thanks in advance, >> > > [cut some text] > > I feel the port itself is solid and ready for the PR to be sent. If > there are no objections I will go ahead and submit it, If there are I > can submit it as eclipse-devel so that maybe a larger user base will > start working with it. If nobody objects my only question is to ask if > it is ok to submit the PR without any other ports that depend on the > 3.1.2 version of eclipse being updated first. Or do I need to submit the > port of eclipse 3.2 first so that the other ports can then be updated to > use it? Maybe it is possible to repocopy eclipse to eclipse31. And change the depending ports for the new location. Just an idea. Don't know how much work it is. Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands