Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 05:59:45 +0100 From: Stacey Roberts <stacey@vickiandstacey.com> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/82389: portupgrade of linux-flashplugin7 to today's latest breaks flash on linux-opera Message-ID: <20050623045944.GO6931@crom.vickiandstacey.com> In-Reply-To: <op.sssfxnn89aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <200506181409.j5IE9dWG016300@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <200506181410.j5IEA0OQ023886@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050622195721.GN6931@crom.vickiandstacey.com> <op.sssfxnn89aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Jeremy!
Thanks for the response.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:57:21 -0500, Stacey Roberts =20
> <stacey@vickiandstacey.com> wrote:
>=20
> >Hi FreeBSD-gnats-submit!
> >
> > An update after cvsup'ing to latest linux-opera today.
> >
> >On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org wrote:
> >
> >>Thank you very much for your problem report.
> >>It has the internal identification `ports/82389'.
> >>The individual assigned to look at your
> >>report is: freebsd-ports-bugs.
> >>
> >>You can access the state of your problem report at any time
> >>via this link:
> >>
> >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D82389
> >>
> >>>Category: ports
> >>>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
> >>>Synopsis: portupgrade of linux-flashplugin7 to today's latest =
=20
> >>breaks flash on linux-opera
> >>>Arrival-Date: Sat Jun 18 14:10:00 GMT 2005
> >
> >
> >Portupgrading linux-opera to latest in ports tree did *NOT* resolve the =
=20
> >fact that linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is now broken after latest updates.
>=20
> I am confusing, I thought you said linux-flashplugin7? This is =20
> linux-flashplugin6. I have no idea how well linux-flashplugin6 works, but=
=20
> I would recommend to use linux-flashplugin7 instead that I am using it =
=20
> everyday. It does work.
Fair enough. When I originally noticed the problem, it actually *was* conce=
rning a machine running linux-flashplugin7. However there are a few boxes h=
ere with version 6 installed, one of which relates to my subsequent post ab=
out the fact that the work-around I found for linux-flashplugin7 doesn't wo=
rk for version 6.
I will remove version 6, and install version 7.
Thanks for the time.
Regards,
Stacey
>=20
> >BTW, the test that I'm running is going to http://www.macromedia.com =20
> >which has a flash animation routine on its homepage that was viewable =
=20
> >before portupgrading linux-flashplugin on that box recently.
>=20
> Works fine with linux-flashplugin7.
>=20
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>=20
> >If there is anything else I can test, please let me know.
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Stacey
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org
> FreeBSD GNOME Team
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
>=20
--gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQEVAwUBQrpButetyy/wI4UpAQE17Qf+KV4PvR5jLudt8iM4yROJwhJGY5TyZMY5
qmJbvKOwYxa7es6Yc+/LLd4C91siiKwbBu46kwp7v0c9V4CwGqpoU1TUI+w29X4l
HtPqohtP7Q7claq7dQkDaOaExDcisDFx6LM5T+MNA0C40dCCagdBdE+leL3J0WZE
5ggh/bziJTDKgYX+xY0Eew4+u0SnfM7yBp7E1xDx2e1hJA6CX/9pFJLfQUwOrt4B
SZFKI6N5MuxFZrUkCxgY9MfPgyguF3K5GA9LpOoMj+QevghT2LAqczgJQIYqPfIG
m73sTmT2zloDcTVqR4RRAv2xnGbZuwbouApk4wXT9tbebYPLNBookA==
=q0e/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050623045944.GO6931>