From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Dec 12 5:33: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1EB14F9C for ; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 05:33:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA22434 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 14:32:58 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA49099 for freebsd-arch@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 14:32:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp [192.51.44.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D69914F63; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 05:32:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-MX9911-Fujitsu Gateway) id WAA27169; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 22:32:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp by m1.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912-Fujitsu Domain Master) id WAA22540; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 22:32:48 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([192.168.245.169]) by incapgw.fujitsu.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-9912) id WAA22723; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 22:32:47 +0900 (JST) To: green@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 5th patch] In-Reply-To: References: <19991212040532I.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 20.4 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19991212223306D.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 22:33:06 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 990905(IM130) Lines: 15 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Do you think you could investigate updating ip6_fw's functionality to > match that of the IPv4 IPFW? If you need help doing this, I am > certainly willing. > Then again, I'd think it would be possible to merge the two... I agree. Trying to update current IPv4 IPFW to IPv4/IPv6 IPFW will be most straight-forward. I'll try to investigate it and temporally remove IPv6 IPFW part included in the last patches. Yoshinobu Inoue > -- > Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / > green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message