From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 4 23:25:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A2A37B41D for ; Sat, 4 May 2002 23:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g456Psf42651 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 15:25:54 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) In-Reply-To: <20020504162912.M88188-100000@master.gorean.org> References: <20020504232627100.AAA911@empty1.ekahuna.com@pc02.ekahuna.com> <20020504162912.M88188-100000@master.gorean.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 15 From: Makoto Matsushita To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 15:25:52 +0900 Message-Id: <20020505152552H.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG DougB> You have made some rather absurd non sequiturs here. However, I DougB> have clearly said on numerous occasions that BIND 8 users DougB> should be using 8.3.1. Just FYI: nsupdate(8) bundled with BIND 8.3.1 is known as *broken*. If 4.6-RELEASE is out, all nsupdate(8) users will confuse that it dosn't work as expected. BIND 8.3.2 (if released) fixes this problem. ISC doesn't allow us to fix this problem to FreeBSD's BIND 8.3.1, so 4.6-RELEASE's nsupdate(8) is broken also. Still you want to say all users should upgrade their BIND 8.2.4 to 8.3.1? :-) -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message