From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 29 11:49:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05EA37B401 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0AF43F75 for ; Thu, 29 May 2003 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.147.188.198]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with ESMTP id <200305291849440510024e8de>; Thu, 29 May 2003 18:49:44 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h4TInhOA010447; Thu, 29 May 2003 14:49:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h4TInhxi010444; Thu, 29 May 2003 14:49:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: "Lee Harr" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 29 May 2003 14:49:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44llwpwptk.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: floppy disk hardware failure ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 18:49:46 -0000 "Lee Harr" writes: > Is this a hardware problem? I get the same thing with all disks I > have tried. Yes, probably. I'm guessing it's an MS-DOS type floppy, being mounted with "mount -t msdos". You might try the mtools, which parse the filesystem a little differently, but it's unlikely to matter when the very first block is failing.