From owner-freebsd-advocacy Fri Nov 22 23:15:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AC537B401 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:15:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCC043E3B for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:15:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.24] helo=mindspring.com) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18FUVu-00067c-00; Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:15:38 -0800 Message-ID: <3DDF2A12.31DABCF5@mindspring.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:11:14 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Advocacy Subject: Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail) References: <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123023624.GA97416@gothmog.gr> <017101c2929b$18ef7e50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123033041.GA3884@gothmog.gr> <019901c292a3$b9c31690$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123040925.GB4320@gothmog.gr> <01a201c292a7$23338d50$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Giorgos writes: > > Taking the discussion off-list and bringing > > back to the lists parts of it is both confusing > > and unfair for the rest of the people of the list. > > So is having a list with no proper Reply-To header in messages, making it > impossible to reply to the list without changing the recipient name for each > and every reply by hand. I don't understand the logic behind that. Then you should read section 3.5 of RFC-2076 and section 3.6.2 of RFC-2822, so you can be enlightened. See also all of the Draft RFC draft-meyer-reqbehaviors-manager, which mandates that end-to-end fields not be modified, and specifically prohibits their insertion by mailing list server software. Frankly, your headers indicate that your MUA is Outlook Express version 6.00.2720.3000. In that MUA, there is an icon bar in the message viewing window, ans the second and third buttons from the left are "Reply" and "Reply All", respectively. In addition, if you were in the message crowsing window, which displays the "Subject:" lines and other information about messages, you can use the right mouse button to get a menu, where the third menu item is "Reply to Sender" , and the fourth is "Reply to All". Finally, the fifth entry in the program menu bar is "Message", and the thirs and fourth items are identical to those in the right-button menu previously discussed. Actually, you had to go a fair distance out of your way to send a private message to a mailing list, since you had to manually add an address. The manual addressing of a message that you are claiming, being unnecessary (despite your claim to the contrary) because of the seperation of reply options. -- Terry -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message