From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 23 08:47:21 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C432316A41A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:47:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7405213C428
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:47:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost)
	by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id SAA08171;
	Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:47:10 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 18:47:09 +1000 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: Karol Kwiatkowski <karol.kwiat@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <46CD4173.1080000@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1070823183408.26941D-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
	Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Subject: Re: fsck strangeness
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:47:21 -0000

On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
 > Ian Smith wrote:
 > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Chris wrote:
 > >  > If its bad to run fsck on a mounted read,write then why does
 > >  > background fsck do it? or you talking about foreground fsck only?
 > > 
 > > Well I was referring to foreground fsck, and I still don't know why
 > > running it on a mounted fs is 'bad' when fsck runs in 'NO WRITE' mode
 > > anyway when it finds a fs is mounted, hence my query above.
 > 
 > Here's my understanding:
 > 
 > Mounted fs (rw) isn't in stable state, there may be some writes to it -
 > daemons, buffers flushes, etc. In this condition fsck can report
 > inconsistency. And fsck running in 'NO WRITE' won't help anyway :)

a) Absolutely.

b) Indeed it usually does, fairly consistently, especially on /var.

c) No it won't help (except where it can help locate problems in a real 
mess like bad blocks), but the assertion in question was, can it hurt?

Cheers, Ian