From owner-freebsd-ipfw Mon Nov 18 17:53: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3068C37B401 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA2743E97 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:52:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gAJ1qwAh037258; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:52:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gAJ1qw62037257; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:52:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 17:52:58 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Michael Sierchio Cc: ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Apparent Bug in IPFW2 on 4.7-RELEASE-p2 Message-ID: <20021118175258.A37219@xorpc.icir.org> References: <200211130102.27773.john@jnielsen.net> <20021113003045.A35862@xorpc.icir.org> <3DD7D3CC.50701@tenebras.com> <20021117093955.A17750@xorpc.icir.org> <3DD99810.7080000@tenebras.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3DD99810.7080000@tenebras.com>; from kudzu@tenebras.com on Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:46:56PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG known and fixed bug -- the kernel was using the wrong address (src instead of dst, and viceversa) in the 1.2.3.4/24{3,45} instructions. Fixed in rev.1.6.2.4 of ip_fw2.c (oct.24) cheers luigi On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 05:46:56PM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > the 1.2.3.4/24{3,45} notation doesn't seem to work. Witness (from ipfw show): > > 01910 0 0 allow udp from any to 66.92.188.0/24{18,241} dst-port 53 in recv sis0 > 01920 1 62 allow udp from any to 66.92.188.18 dst-port 53 in recv sis0 > 01930 3 184 allow udp from any to 66.92.188.241 dst-port 53 in recv sis0 > > > Rule 1910 should have been triggered in the case of these > packets, and should never have gotten to rules 1920 or 1930 > > Has this been reported before, and was I just sleeping? > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message