Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:15:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Marco Antonio Muskus Muskus <mamuskus@edatel.com.co> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211915080.4170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <4FE34DEC.9070908@edatel.com.co> References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <CAPj0R5Kmi-%2BdJ7mPvTrTAoS8O983svOyR2WyK2_v1Cr07dSS_A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211413140.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhuQ%2BbxKW9%2BdX%2BzS9mErwz8JSkV2G7qL0KfB8BH_LGJAgA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211539230.2903@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvR_eKtVxdKcaMyOS7tLw_AOHKgUy3o7mJn2b=chMA0Xw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211619250.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvwKZm7heoe7tpfhYCJvkknw_HC7aFjCu%2B-1xYQBmV6ng@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhsyOh34SghWzQPpnTig%2BUmSEO2VP7jfPxTXs9zW9Uakeg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211707570.3361@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <AA485AA5-F3F8-4D02-8F59-05AC76172C40@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211804540.3631@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <9672338A-45DA-4680-977B-253CEF3201C8@gmail.com> <4FE34DEC.9070908@edatel.com.co>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ZFS is superior to UFS. End of the history. > > There is no point in use old technology (UFS) when the new one can make the > same as the older and better ? anyway there must be morons here like me that after observation conclude that older is far safer and better. But if you want "end of history" then fine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211915080.4170>