From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Sep 30 01:31:09 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA12975
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca13-23.ix.netcom.com [204.32.168.55])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA12970
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.7/8.6.9) id BAA10658; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:30:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199709300830.BAA10658@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <11308.875606493@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: Uh oh.. Time to take another look at the packages collection!
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I grabbed packages-current off of ftp.cdrom.com.  

Well, package-current is still 655MB on ftp.cdrom.com.

 * 						     What should I be
 * grabbing instead for the official "no cdrom" dist?  It seems like
 * we go through this every time - you want some space to make an
 * "exportable" collection too? ;-)

That was not the reason for the discrepancy, but anyway -- I will
build a set of packages for the CDROM before the release
("packages-2.2.5").

No thanks, I don't have time to take care of two collections on a
regular basis.  If you want something for a snap, yell at me or just
go through ports/LEGAL by hand (there aren't that many).

Satoshi