From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 4 07:44:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8BD16A41F; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:44:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from haven.freebsd.dk (haven.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA6643D45; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:44:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by haven.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A519BC69; Thu, 4 Aug 2005 07:44:31 +0000 (UTC) To: Andrea Campi From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Aug 2005 09:38:00 +0200." <20050804073759.GB65682@webcom.it> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 09:44:31 +0200 Message-ID: <6630.1123141471@phk.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Giorgos Keramidas , cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New NO_XXX knobs X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 07:44:34 -0000 In message <20050804073759.GB65682@webcom.it>, Andrea Campi writes: >> Yes, we need to document this better. > >Also, do you plan on putting any of these in >src/tools/tools/nanobsd/make.conf ? Most if not all of them would make sense. I am currently rewriting nanobsd to be built by the new nanobsd.sh script and part of the necessary work was finding out what to do about the build options. Based on Warners input, it will now be split into "BUILD", "INSTALL" and "WORLD" options, corresponding to the three columns in my build survey. So I guess the answer is yes, of a sort :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.