From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Feb  1 14:13:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA11773
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 14:13:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (root@buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA11764;
          Sat, 1 Feb 1997 14:13:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from buffnet1.buffnet.net (buffnet1.buffnet.net [205.246.19.10]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA05301; Sat, 1 Feb 1997 17:15:24 -0500
Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net by buffnet1.buffnet.net id aa03139;
          1 Feb 97 17:14 EST
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 1997 17:13:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Steve <shovey@buffnet.net>
To: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: slow ypserv problem
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.94.970201014400.11377A-100000@misery.sdf.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970201171336.6568A-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 1 Feb 1997, Tom Samplonius wrote:
>   Bill knows.
> 
>   ypserv was completely re-written for 2.2.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
It it possible to get just that piece for 2.1? or wouldnt it work under
2.1?