From owner-freebsd-atm Mon Mar 19 10:36:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Received: from mail.eecs.uic.edu (mail.eecs.uic.edu [131.193.32.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7383037B719 for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 10:36:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kluruo@eecs.uic.edu) Received: from oscar.eecs.uic.edu (oscar.eecs.uic.edu [131.193.41.34]) by mail.eecs.uic.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA23828; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:36:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost by oscar.eecs.uic.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA06398; Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:36:49 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: oscar.eecs.uic.edu: kluruo owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:36:49 -0600 (CST) From: Kuthonuzo Luruo To: Mike Tancsa Cc: freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATM under 4.2 In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010319131612.0221f7a0@marble.sentex.ca> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 12:21 PM 3/19/01 -0600, Kuthonuzo Luruo wrote: > >the old FreeBSD installation did have ALTQ installed. i mean to say that i > >don't have ALTQ in my new 4.2 install. [ i did a clean intall moving from > >2.2.8 to 4.2 ] > > OK. But yes, you do want to install altq. I did try it on a back to back > configuration and it seemed to work just fine at least on on a single PVC > which I tried. > > ---Mike ok. thanks for the feedback. a non-ALTQ dependent config procedure would have been nice since i don't have any other reason to use ALTQ immediately. but yes, i'll install ALTQ and see how it goes. thanks. -thonuzo > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message