From owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Mon Nov 28 07:53:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B230C59D91 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25425125A for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:53:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id c21so211459637ioj.1 for ; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 23:53:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z/DPwLbfFTApsGBu2ECsmpn4mnh00Ngrokl5lEQ8Bgc=; b=jN/AIVEn33M0fPxWWwrhP115yAkfrGg5UX60atxx3SZwzFvbRRd9kK4ddFSNlhrrZW bMIW/kMgVHlD2mh1ygszDe9wp/nuQCFvJoqbh0ZPO+zyioq+UJoRulZIgCtIFWcPTXYb MgXvaKXMSjFe82IS6G8aYHwos8LSjOr7wep1EmhJOV4GuXqYmoxsQI4ZtDKmluFFloUR 385Fv7jcyH5vQ6CG+dihiS8GDeAgDe0a4XXID4Zr6tqIe7wEB5P6mpDFevy8pc3oBKil jJmNpUogaRjmZn/rYlCnXpsScUPNmMYikuJwsB5JUyDbvI6aahBEOCE12CYo5LQS0x6c AEcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=z/DPwLbfFTApsGBu2ECsmpn4mnh00Ngrokl5lEQ8Bgc=; b=mYXrL2KPf8dhn56xu1KRD12YwlLInBf+9Kd8ZrbsvE4lh6sCBjIrknMxAtYHEblWzQ ezHcAkNzBm6rs9rERtbyS2Ooc/KppGZ/GMSuMBlFhQCNQ5A/M/TU+glhfFmIr07j2Zlk tulX14kaOaYLUlA3iydnGDgYlh9fewIqWElntXb3C/DaWtNRcPRVJBGfG0iADGBa2c7D h/1/ZjFNrnwRooy6AxKfOZPrEhvyo9jdYqrK9QLxwRYuVrCcUB/oogk7wTkcM7Y2nyeT qcwH+XS8akjCdRi81KjDcUW60L6RY9q1QgSmergu0GFKuGvl7OanrEvwFevk7IN1TlGj Xv9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01TSfXkAb1TGEKiGdstEVVbLzm6IwWIo9WtqDVul/2Jl1ob4on/7AXDazXmZQVjeRq7x5fKpjVolsnMGg== X-Received: by 10.107.136.86 with SMTP id k83mr15302872iod.99.1480319598524; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 23:53:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.39.134 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Nov 2016 23:53:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Adrian Chadd Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 23:53:17 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qfCHYgv1QkPA9sn4a1pa0EJ3i_I Message-ID: Subject: Re: radiotap 802.11 change? To: Andriy Voskoboinyk Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 07:53:19 -0000 Weird, ok. Wonder why ath(4) and my ath10k branch both see duplicate frames. interesting. -adrian On 27 November 2016 at 22:29, Andriy Voskoboinyk wrote: > Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:26:28 +0200 =D0=B1=D1=83=D0=BB=D0=BE =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0= =BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE Adrian Chadd > : > > r309210, RTL8188CE - still no duplicates seen. > > >> ok, hm. how'd we end up with duplicates? >> >> >> >> -adrian >> >> >> On 25 November 2016 at 13:47, Andriy Voskoboinyk >> wrote: >>> >>> Fri, 25 Nov 2016 21:33:24 +0200 =D0=B1=D1=83=D0=BB=D0=BE =D0=BD=D0=B0= =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE Adrian Chadd >>> : >>> >>> 12.0-CURRENT (r308862), rtwn(4) (RTL8188CE), wireshark v2.0.5, >>> non-promiscuous mode: >>> 1) beacon from the AP, 127 bytes: >>> - radiotap header len: 24 bytes (correct); >>> - frame header len: 24 bytes >>> - fixed params: 12 bytes >>> - tagged params: 67 bytes >>> 2) discarded (duplicate) data frame, 1524 bytes: >>> - radiotap header len: 24 bytes >>> - frame header len (+ EIV): 32 bytes >>> - data: 1468 bytes >>> >>>> hiya, >>>> >>>> I've noticed something weird lately - it seems wlan radiotap (both >>>> 802.3 and 802.11 radiotap sessions) are now doubling up on RX'ed >>>> frames. >>>> >>>> Has anyone seen this? >>>> >>>> >>>> -adrian >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"