Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 09:53:47 -0700 From: Chris <portmaster@bsdforge.com> To: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> Cc: freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: poudriere(8) short circuits my ability to build packages Message-ID: <fd6d084eca9c67eb2c49e0d4f1d5e96b@bsdforge.com> In-Reply-To: <3f806699-7e0c-4722-a45f-d50d2a2a0739@madpilot.net> References: <78550638a3787fd0897093fdad463a00@bsdforge.com> <3f806699-7e0c-4722-a45f-d50d2a2a0739@madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2024-04-04 00:46, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 04/04/24 09:30, Chris wrote: >> I do all of my development in jails. As such I have no use for >> poudriere(8). >> But an attempt to build editors/vscode threw the following: >> >> The limit imposed by poudriere(8) for the maximum number of files allowed >> to be >> opened by a jail (default 1024) is exceeded during the build of vscode. >> To successfully build vscode with poudriere(8), you must add the following >> line to poudriere.conf: >> MAX_FILES_vscode=8192 >> >> What the... I just want to build a package. Why do I care about poudriere >> limitations, or poudriere at all? How can I just build a package. Users >> (or Maintainers) aren't forced to use poudriere, are they? >> > > The Makefile in editors/vscode has an error message including that text. It > always > writes it, so it assumes it is being built in poudriere. If that's not your > case > you can just ignore it. BUT, if you're building it in a jail (which is > similar to > what poudriere does), you should check your jail limits and make sure > maxfiles is > 8192 or higher. > > That is just a warning to poudriere users. Good to discover. Thank you very much for taking the time to inform me. That's good news. :) > > BTW while poudriere is definitely not mandatory for users, for port > maintainers it > is highly suggested: official packages are built using poudriere, so ports > must > work in poudriere, and maintainers should also verify and test that. Understood. I know it's an important point, and I respect it. I was just concerned that it was my *only* choice. I'm happy to discover it's not. :) Thanks again! -- --Chris Hutchinson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fd6d084eca9c67eb2c49e0d4f1d5e96b>