From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 14:20:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0350C37B404 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail13.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9261D43FD7 for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:20:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 17956 invoked from network); 2 Apr 2003 22:20:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 2 Apr 2003 22:20:13 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h32MK1Ov024269; Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:20:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20030402155327.R662@odysseus.silby.com> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 17:20:01 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Mike Silbersack cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Stephen McKay Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ping ping.8 ping.c src/share/man/man4 inet.4 ip.4 src/sys/netinet in.h in_pcb.h ip.h ip_input.c ip_output.c ip_var.h src/usr.bin/netstat inet.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 22:20:08 -0000 On 02-Apr-2003 Mike Silbersack wrote: > But, if such a rollback would break too many things, I can live with it, > assuming that such pranks *never happen again*. Do the following log messages greatly offend your sensibilities? > lcvs log -r1.158 -r1.159 -r1.160 init_main.c ... total revisions: 252; selected revisions: 3 description: ---------------------------- revision 1.160 date: 2001/02/24 03:40:23; author: jhb; state: Exp; lines: +1 -24 It turns out the kernel console works fine and thus doesn't need quite this much extra testing. ---------------------------- revision 1.159 date: 2001/02/23 23:05:46; author: peter; state: Exp; lines: +1 -3 Stricter style(9) conformance - remove unnecessary blank lines in previous commit. ---------------------------- revision 1.158 date: 2001/02/23 19:44:25; author: jhb; state: Exp; lines: +25 -1 Test out the kernel console just before launching the AP's. ============================================================================= -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/