From owner-freebsd-current  Mon May 28  0:12:19 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 64FB037B422; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dima@unixfreak.org)
Received: from hornet.unixfreak.org (hornet [63.198.170.140])
	by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0D1C43E0B; Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: make release failure 
In-Reply-To: <20010527235220.A75041@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on "Sun, 27 May 2001 23:52:20 -0700"
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:12:17 -0700
From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>
Message-Id: <20010528071217.0D1C43E0B@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:32:09PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > +.if !defined(NORELNOTES)
> 
> Do we really need Yet Another Knob?  Why isn't NODOC suffient?

FWIW, I think we should lose NORELNOTES; as you say, NODOC is
sufficient.

> I cannot think of any reason that the people who typically use NODOC=yes
> would want release notes.  

Heh, it isn't like they could get them, anyway.  RELNOTESng depends on
the doc tree.

					Dima Dorfman
					dima@unixfreak.org

> Or please at least treat NODOCS=yes ==> NORELNOTES=yes.
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> 

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message